Proof of appointments and signatures unnecessary

In force

(1)

In this section —

office holder means —

(a)

the CEO; or

(b)

the Commissioner of Police or any other police officer; or

(c)

a person authorised under section 22 or 23; or

(ca)

a person authorised by the Commissioner of Police for the purposes of section 105(1)(c); or

(d)

a person authorised by the CEO for the purposes of section 105(1)(d) or (2)(c); or

(e)

a person who may give an approval for the purposes of section 105(3A); or

(f)

an approved officer, as that term is defined in the Road Traffic (Vehicles) Act 2012 section 77.

(2)

For the purposes of a road law, it is not necessary to prove the appointment of an office holder.

(3)

For the purposes of a road law, a signature purporting to be the signature of an office holder is evidence of the signature it purports to be.

[Section 116 amended: No. 8 of 2012 s. 222; No. 15 of 2024 s. 29.]

Research tools for this sectionSubscription

The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.