DPP v Loftus

[2004] VSC 39

Supreme Court of Victoria

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. matter of
1. sub-section and the subsequent requirements subject-matter of the sub-section.
1. Further, the source of the
1. power for requiring a person to undergo a preliminary breath test is contained

Citation[2004] VSC 39

CourtVSC

JurisdictionVictoria

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in