Serious unprofessional conduct involving gross delay, a finding of dishonesty, and repeated failure to cooperate with the regulatory body does not necessarily require striking off where the practitioner's personality traits explain the conduct and supervised practice can adequately protect the public. The Court imposed censure, a $20,000 fine, three years of supervised practice, and file restrictions as an alternative to removal from the roll.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.