Barrister AI
All legislation
ACTAct
In force
This is the latest official compilation.Check the official source →
s 30

Defence or stay of proceeding instead of prohibition order or injunction

In force
Part 2Constitution and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

30 Defence or stay of proceeding instead of prohibition order or injunction

(1)

A proceeding in the court must not be restrained by a prohibition order or injunction.

(2)

A defence is available in a proceeding in the court if an injunction would previously have been available in a pre-Judicature Act proceeding of the same kind.

(3)

However, this section does not prevent the court from ordering a stay in a proceeding in the court.

(4)

The court may grant a stay in a proceeding in the court on application by an entitled person.

(5)

In this section:

entitled person, in relation to a proceeding in the court, means a person (whether or not the person is a party to the proceeding) who would have been entitled, in relation to a pre-Judicature Act proceeding of the same kind—

(a)

to apply to a court to restrain the prosecution of the proceeding; or

(b)

to enforce any order or rule in contravention of which all or part of the proceeding had been taken.

Research tools for this sectionPro

The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.

Section 30 — Defence or stay of proceeding instead of prohibition order or injunction — Supreme Court Act 1933 (Australian Capital Territory) — Barrister AI