Credit Act 1984

Where a buyer who has entered into a tied loan contract or tied continuing credit contract with a linked credit provider of a supplier for the provision of credit in respect of the payment by the buyer for goods or services supplied by the supplier under a contract of sale is entitled to claim damages against or recover a sum of money from the supplier for misrepresentation, breach of contract or failure of consideration in relation to the contract of sale, the supplier and linked credit provider are, subject to this section, jointly and severally liable to the buyer for the damages or sum of money.

It is a defence to proceedings arising under subsection (1) against a linked credit provider of a supplier if the linked credit provider proves—

that the credit provided by him to the buyer was provided as a result of an approach by the buyer to the credit provider that was not induced by the supplier;

where the proceedings relate to a contract of sale with respect to which a tied loan contract applies, that—

after due inquiry before he became such a linked credit provider, he was satisfied that the supplier was of good reputation in respect of his financial standing and ethical standards of trading;

since becoming such a linked credit provider, but before the tied loan contract was entered into, he had not had cause to suspect, and had not suspected, that the buyer might be entitled to claim damages against or recover a sum of money from, the supplier for misrepresentation, breach of contract or failure of consideration as referred to in subsection (1); and

since becoming such a linked credit provider, but before the tied loan contract was entered into, he had not had any cause to suspect, and had not suspected, that the supplier might be unable to meet his liabilities as and when they fell due; or

where the proceedings relate to a contract of sale with respect to which a tied continuing credit contract entered into by the linked credit provider under an agreement of the kind referred to in section 48(2)(a)(ii) applies, that, having regard to—

the nature and volume of business carried on by the linked credit provider; and

such other matters as appear to be relevant in the circumstances of the case—

Subject to subsection (4), a buyer may in any proceedings set up the liability of a linked credit provider for damages or a sum of money under subsection (1) in diminution or extinction of the buyer's liability upon any claim for damages or a sum of money made by the linked credit provider against the buyer in the proceedings.

Subject to subsection (5), a buyer may not—

bring proceedings for damages or to recover a sum of money from a linked credit provider; or

where proceedings are brought against the buyer by a linked credit provider, make a cross-claim or exercise a right referred to in subsection (3) against the linked credit provider—

Subsection (4) and paragraph (a) of subsection (8) do not apply where—

the supplier—

is a bankrupt or a person whose affairs are being dealt with under Part X of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 of the Commonwealth as amended and in force for the time being;

being a body corporate, has been dissolved or is commenced to be wound up; or

being a natural person, has died;

the Court believes on reasonable grounds that it is not reasonably likely that any part of a judgment obtained against the supplier would be satisfied and has on the application of the buyer declared that subsection (4) and paragraph (a) of subsection (8) do not apply in that case; or

the buyer satisfies the Court that he has made reasonable efforts to locate the supplier but has been unable to do so and the Court declares that subsection (4) and paragraph (a) of subsection (8) do not apply in that case.

A reference in subsection (5) to the commencement of winding-up is a reference to commencement of winding-up as determined under the law relating to companies in the place where the body corporate is being wound up.

The liability of a linked credit provider to a buyer for damages or a sum of money in respect of a contract of sale referred to in subsection (1) does not exceed the sum of—

the amount financed under the tied loan contract or tied continuing credit contract in relation to the contract of sale;

the amount of interest (if any) or damages in the nature of interest allowed or awarded against the linked credit provider by the Court; and

the amount of costs (if any) awarded by the Court against the linked credit provider or supplier or both.

Where in proceedings in respect of the liability arising under subsection (1) judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider, the judgment—

shall not be enforced against the linked credit provider unless a written demand made on the supplier for satisfaction of the judgment has remained unsatisfied for not less than 30 days; and

may be enforced against the linked credit provider only to the extent of—

the amount calculated in accordance with subsection (7); or

so much of the judgment debt as has not been satisfied by the supplier—

Where, in proceedings in respect of the liability arising under subsection (1), a right referred to in subsection (3) is established against a linked credit provider, the buyer—

shall not receive the benefit of the right unless judgment has been given against the supplier and linked credit provider, a written demand has been made on the supplier for satisfaction of the judgment and the demand has remained unsatisfied for not less than 30 days; and

may receive the benefit only to the extent of—

the amount calculated in accordance with subsection (7); or

so much of the judgment debt as has not been satisfied by the supplier—

Unless the linked credit provider and supplier otherwise agree, the supplier is liable to the linked credit provider for the amount of a loss suffered by the linked credit provider, being an amount not exceeding the maximum amount of his liability under subsection (7) and, unless the Court otherwise determines, the amount of costs (if any) reasonably incurred by him in defending the proceedings by reason of which the liability was incurred.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other Act, where in proceedings in respect of the liability arising under subsection (1), judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider or against a linked credit provider, for damages or a sum of money, the Court shall upon application by the buyer, unless good cause is shown to the contrary, allow or award interest to the buyer against the supplier and linked credit provider or against the linked credit provider, as the case may be, upon the whole or part of the damages or sum of money—

at the percentage rate per annum that is the annual percentage rate under the tied loan contract or tied continuing credit contract; or

at 8 per centum per annum or, where some other percentage rate per annum is prescribed, that other rate—

In determining whether good cause is shown against allowing or awarding interest under subsection (11) on the whole or part of the damages or sum of money, the Court shall take into account any payment made into court by the supplier or linked credit provider, as the case may be.

Where a judgment in respect of a liability arising under subsection (1) in relation to a contract of sale is enforced against a linked credit provider, the linked credit provider is subrogated to the extent of the judgment so enforced to any rights that the buyer would, but for the judgment, have had against any person in respect of the loss or damage suffered by him as a result of the misrepresentation, breach of contract or failure of consideration in relation to the contract of sale from which the liability arose.