A significant disparity between co-offenders' sentences does not infringe the parity principle where there are very substantial differences in the roles played in the offending, criminal histories, and rehabilitation prospects. The Court confirmed that the approach to parity complaints is relevantly analogous to that for manifest excess.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 27 later cases that cite this judgment.
16 of the 27 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.