Recommendation for further action in respect of VAGO officers
81 Recommendation for further action in respect of VAGO officers
S. 81(1) amended by No. 31/2024 s. 113(Sch. 1 item 1.124(a)).
Integrity Oversight Victoria may at any time recommend in private to the Auditor-General the undertaking of a disciplinary process or action against any VAGO officer other than the Auditor-General.
S. 81(2) amended by No. 31/2024 s. 113(Sch. 1 item 1.124(b)).
Subsection (1) does not limit the power of Integrity Oversight Victoria to make a public recommendation if Integrity Oversight Victoria considers that the Auditor-General has failed to take appropriate action in relation to the recommendation.
S. 81(3) amended by No. 31/2024 s. 113(Sch. 1 item 1.124(b)).
If Integrity Oversight Victoria is satisfied that any conduct of any VAGO officer which has been the subject of a complaint, investigation or other finding should be the subject of any further investigatory or enforcement action, Integrity Oversight Victoria may make a recommendation to that effect to any or all of the following—
the Chief Commissioner of Police;
the Director of Public Prosecutions;
the Australian Federal Police;
the IBAC;
the Victorian WorkCover Authority;
any other person or body prescribed for the purposes of this subsection.
S. 82 inserted by No. 82/2012 s. 278.
The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.