How we compare · Australia
Six products, the same sixteen questions.
| Question | Barrister AIBuilt by barristers · Australian | HabeasAustralian legal AI | HarveyInternational legal AI | LegoraInternational legal AI | Westlaw AUThomson Reuters · + CoCounsel | Lexis+ AULexisNexis · + Protégé |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it costs, and who may buy itMost legal AI is sold to firms, by the seat, on a yearly contract, at a price you have to ask for. | ||||||
| What it costsFor one practitioner, from the vendor’s own site. Where none is published, the figure is what buyer guides report. | A$33a monthPublishedCounsel, incl. GST: A$15 of research included, then pay per use. Silk plans with usage included from A$55 a month. Reading cases is free. No contract | A$125a monthPublishedSole practitioner plan, 500 queries a month, 14-day trial. A$200 buys 1,000 | US$1,200a seat a monthReportedNo published price. About 20 seats on a yearly contract, about US$288,000 to start | US$3,000a seat a yearReportedNo published price. About 10 seats, quote after a demo; its top tier is metered at an unpublished rate | A$133a month, no AIPart publishedWestlaw AU for one practitioner, 12-month term, buy online. CoCounsel and the AI tiers are quote only | A$160a month, no AIPart publishedLexis+ Lite, buy online. Lexis+ with Protégé is quote only; its 2026 small-firm offer excluded barristers |
| One barrister can sign up todayNo firm, no seat minimum, no yearly contract, no procurement. | YesSign up yourself. No card on the free plan | YesSole practitioner plan, with a 14-day trial | NoDemo and sales only. No individual plan | NoDemo only. Guides report a 10-seat minimum | PartlyWestlaw AU online. CoCounsel by quote only | PartlyLexis+ Lite online. A$138 Protégé plan online, without Lexis legal content |
| Pay only for the research you runA quiet month should cost less than a busy one. Seat licences do not work that way. | YesCounsel pays per use past its included A$15. Silk plans include usage | NoMonthly plan with a query allowance | NoPer seat, on a yearly contract | PartlyAgent Pro, its top tier, is metered | NoSubscription, on a 12-month term | NoSubscription, on a 12-month term |
| Australian law, first-handWhether the product holds Australian law itself, or only works on what you give it. | ||||||
| Holds Australian law itselfIts own indexed set of Australian judgments and legislation — not just the files you upload. | YesJudgments and legislation, indexed and linked | YesIts own set of Australian judgments and legislation | PartlyFederal and NSW sources, searched from official sites | NoHosts US and European law. Nothing Australian | YesLong-standing Australian case law and legislation | YesLong-standing Australian case law and legislation |
| New decisions daily, summarisedJudgments handed down yesterday, read and summarised before you start work. Not a keyword alert. | YesDaily digest across 20+ courts, every case in it summarised | NoSearch recent decisions yourself. No daily feed | NoUS court docket alerts only. Nothing Australian | PartlyTracks regulation. Judgments not mentioned | PartlyAlerts and editorial digests. Not AI summaries | PartlyDaily judgment emails. Summaries on request |
| The law as it stood on a past dateFor a claim that arose in 2011, what the section said in 2011 — and only the cases that existed then. | PartlyPoint-in-time legislation. Not yet cases as at a date | NoNo point-in-time feature on its site | NoNo point-in-time feature described | NoItalian point-in-time only. Nothing Australian | PartlySold separately as TimeBase | PartlyHistorical versions of Acts, via LawNow |
| Where it runsAt the bar table, on the train, and inside Word. | ||||||
| iPhone and iPad appRead a judgment, check a case and search away from your desk. | YesFree on the Australian App Store | NoWeb app only. Nothing in the app stores | YesiPhone and iPad app, with a firm login | PartlyiPhone and Android apps. No iPad build | NoIts app is for Westlaw Edge, the US product. ProView reads eBooks | NoNo Lexis+ app in Australia. Lexis Red reads eBooks |
| Connects to Word and other appsSend what you have highlighted to the product, or draft inside the document itself. Most of this table does the second. | YesWord add-in, answers in a pane inside Word. Right-click Ask Junior in Pages, Mail and PDF readers | NoNo Word add-in described | YesWord and Outlook add-ins | YesWord and Outlook add-ins | YesCoCounsel for Word, available in Australia | YesLexis Create+ Word add-in, priced separately |
| Reads the brief you give itGive it the material and ask questions of it. Everyone here does a version of this. | YesBriefs, checked against the same Australian law | YesDocument upload and analysis, capped by plan | YesDocument review and analysis | YesDocument review and analysis | YesCoCounsel reviews, compares and summarises uploads | YesUpload to Protégé, or to a Vault |
| Where your work goesWhat leaves your computer, where it is held, and how long anyone keeps it. | ||||||
| Never trains AI on your workYour documents and your questions are not used to build anyone’s model. | YesNever, on every plan and every tier | YesClient data not used for training | YesDoes not train on customer data | YesWill not train or fine-tune on your data | YesNot used to train CoCounsel or any LLM | YesNever uses customer data to train AI models |
| Hosted in AustraliaWhere the servers holding your work actually sit. | YesSydney: servers and database. AI model calls go offshore | YesDatabases in Australia. AI calls may go offshore | PartlyAustralian workspace available, on request | PartlyAustralian region offered. AI providers listed in EU and US | YesPrompts, content and output stored in Australia | PartlyLegal AI onshore. Its General AI mode is offshore |
| Documents stay on your computerWhether the file itself is uploaded, or read where it already sits. | YesWith Junior, our desktop app. Not saved on our servers; the file stays on your computer | NoBrowser product. Documents are uploaded | NoDocuments are uploaded to Harvey | NoDocuments are uploaded to Legora | NoDocuments are uploaded to CoCounsel | NoDocuments are uploaded to Protégé or a Vault |
| Answers without keeping anythingWhether anything is still stored after your answer comes back. | YesAlways for briefs; a switch for research | PartlyDelete any time. No retention period published | PartlyZero at model providers. Harvey keeps its own | PartlyModels keep nothing. Legora stores your files | PartlyZero at providers. The firm sets the rest | PartlyUploads outside a Vault deleted each session |
| Evidence you can checkMost of this table publishes a benchmark. The question is what it is a benchmark of. | ||||||
| Publishes a benchmark of its ownMost of this table does. Ours is not unusual in existing — only in what it is run on. | YesEvery per-case score printed, losses included | NoCites others’ numbers. None of its own | YesBigLaw Bench, with sample tasks public | YesBAR. Cases private, no jurisdiction named | YesCoCoBench, and the Vals study. US tasks | PartlyVendor claims only. Sat out the Vals studies |
| That benchmark is on Australian lawA score on US contract review tells an Australian barrister very little about a High Court appeal. | YesAustralian High Court appeals, hidden until judgment | NoNo benchmark to be on | NoNo jurisdiction named. Nothing Australian | NoNo jurisdiction named. Nothing Australian | NoNo Australian benchmark published | NoNo Australian benchmark published |
| Publishes its citation checksA citation you have to verify yourself is work you have to redo. We counted ours and had a machine check them. | Yes30.6 pinpoints a memo. 271 of 306 machine-checked, all matched | NoNo figure on its site | PartlyScores a “source score”. No count published | NoModel scores only. No product figure | NoTracked as a metric. No figure published | NoClaims linked citations. No measured figure |
- Yes
- Partly, or with conditions
- No
On the price row, “Published” means the vendor prints the price on its own site. “Reported” means it does not, and the figure comes from an independent buyer guide — an estimate, in the guide’s own currency, not the vendor’s number. Every guide is linked under Sources.
Sources — where every cell came from (51)
Each cell says what that vendor publishes about itself, or what we found when we checked. Reported prices come from the buyer guides named here. We are not reporting anyone's private pricing.
- Barrister AI — Pricing
- Habeas — Pricing
- Harvey pricing, as reported by Sacra
- Harvey pricing, as reported by Spellbook
- Legora pricing, as reported by Spellbook
- Legora pricing, as reported by Contrary Research
- Thomson Reuters — Westlaw Australia plans and prices
- LexisNexis Australia — online shop
- LexisNexis — Protégé Small Firm Offer, Q1 2026 (PDF)
- Harvey — product pages
- Legora — product pages
- LexisNexis Australia — Protégé Foundational Workflows (shop)
- Legora — usage-based pricing
- Barrister AI — this site
- Habeas — product pages
- Harvey — global data coverage, including Australia
- Legora — legal research (hosted primary law)
- Thomson Reuters — Westlaw Australia
- LexisNexis Australia — Lexis+ AI / Protégé
- LexisNexis Australia — Lexis+ legislation guide (PDF)
- Habeas — “Where Habeas fits in a barrister’s day” (blog)
- Harvey — PacerPro docket alerts (US courts)
- Legora — Monitors
- LexisNexis Australia — Daily Unreported Judgments Notifier
- Legora — Tinexta partnership (Italian law)
- Thomson Reuters — TimeBase point-in-time legislation
- LexisNexis Australia — LawNow historical versions (PDF)
- Barrister AI on the App Store
- Harvey on the App Store
- Legora on the App Store
- Westlaw on the App Store (US accounts only)
- Lexis Red on the App Store
- Barrister AI — Junior
- Harvey — Microsoft integrations
- Legora — Word add-in
- Thomson Reuters — CoCounsel Australia
- LexisNexis Australia — Lexis Create+
- LexisNexis Australia — Protégé (with FAQ)
- Barrister AI — Security
- Habeas — legal and privacy policy
- Harvey — Privacy Center
- Legora — Security
- Harvey — Security
- Legora — pre-approved sub-processors
- Legora — Trust Center
- Barrister AI — the HLLE-1 benchmark, in full
- Habeas — “The accuracy numbers legal AI vendors cite” (blog)
- Harvey — BigLaw Bench
- Legora — the BAR benchmark
- Thomson Reuters — CoCoBench
- Vals AI — Legal AI Report (independent)