Complaints against registered veterinarians
26 Complaints against registered veterinarians
(1) A person may make a complaint to the Board against a registered veterinarian on the ground that the veterinarian:
has been guilty of misconduct;
(b) is guilty of habitual drunkenness, or of addiction to a drug that adversely affects his or her ability to provide veterinary services;
has been found guilty:
(i) in the Territory, of an offence punishable on conviction by imprisonment for 6 months or more; or
(ii) elsewhere, of an offence that would have been an offence so punishable had it been committed in the Territory;
(d) has been found guilty of an offence against the Poisons and Dangerous Drugs Act 1983 or Medicines, Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 2012;
(e) has been found guilty of an offence under the Animal Protection Act 2018;
(f) made a false or misleading statement in connection with his or her application for registration as a veterinarian or as a veterinary specialist; or
(g) having obtained registration as a veterinarian under section 13(1)(a), provided veterinary services while being no longer qualified, within the meaning of that subsection, to do so.
A complaint under this section shall be in writing and shall:
(a) state the complainant's full name, and an address for the service of notices or other documents on the complainant;
(b) clearly identify the registered veterinarian against whom the complaint is made;
contain particulars of the matter complained of; and
be accompanied by the prescribed fee, if any.
(3) A complaint may only be made against a registered veterinarian if the grounds on which the complaint is made arose within the 2 years immediately before the making of the complaint.
The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.