Criminal Procedure Act 1986

If a fact, matter or circumstance was alleged in a notice required to be given to the accused person by the prosecutor in accordance with this Division and the accused person was required to give a defence response under section 143 but did not disclose in the response an intention to dispute or require proof of the fact, matter or circumstance, the court may order that—

a document asserting the alleged fact, matter or circumstance may be admitted at the trial as evidence of the fact, matter or circumstance, and

evidence may not, without the leave of the court, be adduced to contradict or qualify the alleged fact, matter or circumstance.

If evidence was disclosed by the prosecution to the accused person in accordance with this Division and the accused person was required to give a defence response under section 143 but did not include notice in that response under section 143 (1) (c) in relation to that evidence, the court may, by order, dispense with the application of any one or more of the following provisions of the Evidence Act 1995 in relation to the adducing of the evidence at trial—

Division 3, 4 or 5 of Part 2.1,

Part 2.2 or 2.3,

Parts 3.2–3.8.

The court may, on the application of a party, direct that the party may adduce evidence of 2 or more witnesses in the form of a summary if the court is satisfied that—

the summary is not misleading or confusing, and

admission of the summary instead of evidence from the witnesses will not result in unfair prejudice to any party to the proceedings.

The court may, in a direction under subsection (3), require that one or more of the witnesses whose evidence is to be adduced in the form of a summary are to be available for cross-examination.

The opinion rule (within the meaning of the Evidence Act 1995) does not apply to evidence adduced in accordance with a direction under subsection (3).

The provisions of this section are in addition to the provisions of the Evidence Act 1995, in particular, section 190.