Certain decisions by CEO, review of by SAT
33 Certain decisions by CEO, review of by SAT
A person aggrieved by a decision of the CEO to issue under section 23 a farm lease, pearling licence or hatchery licence, whether unconditionally or subject to conditions, may apply to the State Administrative Tribunal for a review of the decision.
The CEO shall serve notice in writing of any decision made by him or her under —
section 12(1), 17(1), 26(1), 27(4), 28(1), 30(2), 32(6) or 55(2); or
section 23 refusing to issue a farm lease, pearling licence or hatchery licence,
on each person aggrieved by that decision and shall in that notice draw attention to the right of review set out in this section.
A person aggrieved by a decision referred to in subsection (2) may apply to the State Administrative Tribunal for a review of the decision.
On receiving a copy of an application under subsection (3) the CEO shall cause a copy of the application to be given to the body known as the Pearl Producers’ Association (Incorporated).
[(5)‑(9) deleted]
In subsections (1) and (3), person aggrieved includes —
in relation to an application for the approval under section 12 of the sale of pearl oysters produced under a hatchery licence, the persons who wish to sell, and the persons who wish to buy, those pearl oysters; and
in relation to a decision of the CEO to issue a farm lease, pearling licence or hatchery licence under section 23, a person who holds a farm lease, pearling licence or hatchery licence; and
in relation to an application for the approval of a transfer under section 32(3), (4) or (5), the persons from whom and to whom the transfer is proposed.
[Section 33 amended: No. 55 of 2004 s. 906; No. 28 of 2006 s. 241.]
The statute text is free to read above. View Pro plans to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.