Migration Regulations 1994

The applicant meets the requirements of subclause (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).

An applicant meets the requirements of this subclause if:

the applicant has made, in Australia, a valid application for a substantive visa of a kind that can be granted if the applicant is in Australia; and

that application has not been finally determined; and

he or she held a substantive visa at the time that application was made; and

either:

he or she has applied for a bridging visa in respect of that application; or

a bridging visa can be granted in respect of that application under regulation 2.21B.

An applicant meets the requirements of this subclause if:

the applicant:

has made, in Australia, a valid application for a substantive visa of a kind that can be granted if the applicant is in Australia; and

held a substantive visa when he or she made the application; and

that application was refused; and

either:

the applicant, or the Minister, has applied, within statutory time limits, for judicial review of a decision in relation to the applicant’s substantive visa application; or

the applicant:

is a member of the family unit of a person whose substantive visa application is the subject of the judicial review proceedings mentioned in subparagraph (i); and

made a substantive visa application that was combined with the substantive visa application mentioned in subparagraph (i); and

at the time of that application, he or she held a Bridging A (Class WA) or Bridging B (Class WB) visa; and

the judicial review proceedings (including proceedings on appeal, if any) are not completed.

An applicant meets the requirements of this subclause if:

the applicant:

holds a Bridging A (Class WA) or Bridging B (Class WB) visa that:

was granted as a result of a valid application, made in Australia, for a substantive visa of a kind that could be granted if the applicant was in Australia; and

is subject to conditions 8101, 8102, 8103, 8104, 8105, 8107, 8108, 8111, 8112, 8115, 8547, 8607 or 8608; and

held a substantive visa when he or she made the substantive visa application; and

he or she has not applied for a protection visa; and

the Minister is satisfied that the applicant has a compelling need to work.

An applicant meets the requirements of this subclause if:

the applicant has made a valid application for:

a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa; or

an Aged Parent (Residence) (Class BP) visa; or

a Contributory Aged Parent (Residence) (Class DG) visa; or

a Contributory Aged Parent (Temporary) (Class UU) visa; and

the application has not been finally determined; and

the applicant has applied for a bridging visa in respect of that application; and

the applicant holds, or has previously held, a Bridging A (Class WA) visa granted under regulation 2.21A in respect of the visa referred to in paragraph (a).

An applicant meets the requirements of this subclause if:

the applicant has made a valid application for:

a Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) visa; or

an Aged Parent (Residence) (Class BP) visa; or

a Contributory Aged Parent (Residence) (Class DG) visa; or

a Contributory Aged Parent (Temporary) (Class UU) visa; and

that application was refused; and

either:

the applicant, or the Minister, has applied, within statutory time limits, for judicial review of a decision in relation to the applicant’s substantive visa application as the holder of a Bridging A (Class WA) or Bridging B (Class WB) visa; or

the applicant:

is a member of the family unit of a person whose substantive visa application is the subject of the judicial review proceedings mentioned in subparagraph (i); and

made a substantive visa application that was combined with the substantive visa application mentioned in subparagraph (i); and

the judicial review proceedings (including proceedings on appeal, if any) are not completed; and

the applicant holds, or has previously held, a Bridging A (Class WA) visa granted under regulation 2.21A in respect of the visa referred to in paragraph (a).