Reasonable steps defence
147 Reasonable steps defence
It is a defence to an offence prescribed by regulations made under section 146(2) to prove that —
the person did not know, and could not reasonably be expected to have known, that an offence was committed; and
either —
the person took all reasonable steps to prevent the contravention of the safety standard or the failure to ensure the safety standard was complied with, as the case may be; or
there were no steps the person could reasonably have taken to prevent the contravention of the safety standard or the failure to ensure the safety standard was complied with.
Without limiting subsection (1), in determining whether things done or omitted to be done by a person constitute reasonable steps, a court may have regard to the following —
the circumstances of the alleged offence;
the measures available and the measures taken to eliminate or minimise the risk of harm to any person;
the personal expertise or experience that the person or an employee or agent of the person had or ought to have had.
This provision refers to the regulations (prescribed by regulations
). Made under this Act:
This Act’s bill:Explanatory memorandumSecond reading speech
The statute text is free to read above. View subscription options to unlock the case-law research tools for each provision.