Fisheries Management Act 1994

Warning to be given on each occasion A person is not guilty of an offence of failing to comply with an information requirement unless the person was warned on that occasion that a failure to comply is an offence.

Self-incrimination not an excuse A person is not excused from an information requirement on the ground that the record, information or answer might incriminate the person or make the person liable to a penalty.

Information or answer not admissible if objection made However, any information furnished or answer given by a natural person in compliance with an information requirement is not admissible in evidence against the person in criminal proceedings (except proceedings for an offence under section 258A or 288D) if—

the person objected at the time to doing so on the ground that it might incriminate the person, or

the person was not warned on that occasion that the person may object to furnishing the information or giving the answer on the ground that it might incriminate the person.

Records admissible Any record furnished by a person in compliance with an information requirement is not inadmissible in evidence against the person in criminal proceedings on the ground that the record might incriminate the person.

Further information Further information obtained as a result of a record or information furnished or of an answer given in compliance with an information requirement is not inadmissible on the ground—

that the record or information had to be furnished or the answer had to be given, or

that the record or information furnished or answer given might incriminate the person.

For the purposes of this section, an information requirement is a requirement made by a fisheries officer under section 258A.